I've done a SVN update, done a forrest clean, replaced the forrest.properties plugins required line to project.required.plugins=org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.themes,org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.structurer and read the howto again... and I'm now getting this 'internal server error' message:
Request URI index.html cause C:\java\forrest\main\webapp\resources\stylesheets\site2book.xsl (The system cannot find the file specified) I notice that there is a file 'site-to-book.xsl' at that location. Is this a problem with the views plugin, or should I be doing some sort of 'plugin flush' to get rid of older versions? By the way: I think putting time into views is well worth it - IMO fully customisable (and hopefully customisable in fairly basic looking HTML, which is what views is working towards) HTML output is vital if Forrest is going to become a mainstream site/doc library building tool. On 10/13/05, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El jue, 13-10-2005 a las 22:17 +1000, David Crossley escribió: > ... > > > > > This is the line out of forrest.properties: > > > > > > > > > > project.required.plugins=org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.viewHelper.xhtml.ls,org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.pdf,org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.themes,org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.structurer > > > > > > > > That is correct. > > > > > > ONLY for the testing version. I do not thing we should recommend them to > > > use right now. That is the why we rollback the views v1. > > > > > > No. But note the bug. I just updated > > > > http://forrest.apache.org/docs_0_80/howto/howto-view-install.html > > > > > > I strongly disagree to change this howtos in anyway related to the new > > > plugins! We need new howtos for views v2. The old ones that are stable > > > and can be used in production are best described by this how to. > > > > I already updated that document immediately after > > we changed the development to the new plugins. > > Sorry, I missed that. > > > Sorry i didn't think clearly enough. Needed quick action. > > We cannot afford the endless questions about the > > status of views. > > Agree, that was the reason to have 2 new plugins as views v2. I thought > we declare views v1 as stable and doing further work in the v2. It is > wee bit like woody and forms. > > > So i suppose that we should copy the current document > > and then revert the old one. I will do that once we > > settle on a name for views v2. > > I already copied them and used structurer as codename. I have not linked > them yet, so we should agree on the codename and I will update them > meanwhile. > > > This is head of trunk. Be careful about how many > > backflips we perform to keep people up-to-date > > with rapidly changing development. > > > > Agreed. > > Thanks David. > > salu2 > -- > thorsten > > "Together we stand, divided we fall!" > Hey you (Pink Floyd) > > -- Paul Bolger 19 Raggatt St Alice Springs NT 0870 08 8953 6780
