On 11/15/05, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suggest that we stop adding target numbers to every issue in Jira. It > seems that we tend to put a fix version that represents what we would > like to see, but not what we can achieve. > > We need faster release cycle and one way to do this is to reduce the > expectations for each release. > > So, I propose that we only put a fix version on something once we *know* > it will be going into the next release. In the long run this will save > us allot of time during the release process sorting out the issue tracker. > > Note this does not mean it will take longer to get features into > Forrest, they will still happen when they happen. It just means we are > not continually updating fix release numbers and misleading our users. > For example, XHTML2 was originally scheduled for 0.6! > > One exception to this rule should be any bug that is considered critical > or blocker will automatically go into the next release. > > WDYT? > > Ross >
+1 The "Roadmap" view is really misleading right now (or, we have a *ton* of work to get done before the next release;) --tim
