El vie, 02-12-2005 a las 15:48 +0100, Cyriaque Dupoirieux escribió: > Tim Williams a écrit : ... > >I mean two different contracts that were to be bound together on the > >output (e.g. nav-section and search-input). For output purposes they > >need to be "contained" together somehow -- accomplished through a > >hook->div right now (or at least it was). > > > > > Correct, but the question of thorsten was - I think - do we need to have : > <forrest:hook name="MyOwnHook"> > Or simply : > <MyOwnHook> > ... > </MyOwnHook> >
Exactly, thx Cyriaque. > By the way, I have made a test on my fichier.fv (replace all my > forrest:hook tags by the direct tag - just to see what the file looks like) > And I have no conclusion :-P . Jeje, it is actually not supported till now. I wanted to know whether it make sense to use direct markup instead of hooks before implementing it. > > I mean, with the direct tags inclusion, the file is smaller but in fact, > I am not sure it is easier to read... That is one point in favor for hooks, there are many more but I do not want to influence the decision making process with features that exist only in the back of my head. ;-) salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
