El mié, 11-01-2006 a las 11:25 +0000, Ross Gardler escribió: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > El mié, 11-01-2006 a las 10:51 +0000, Ross Gardler escribió: > > ... > > > >>>yeah agree, so what do you suggest? Like said I do not see the point in > >>>a 100% copy if I change <5%. > >> > >>That is not how branching works. When you create a branch it only > >>creates copies of the parts that are changed. Therefore, doing an "svn > >>switch" is really quick and easy. > >> > >>Since you have found your requred changes will affect trunk, I'd suggest > >>using a proper branch. > > > > > > What speaks against "just create the final dispatcher > > plugins (like I did in the branch) in the trunk and leave v1 and v2 in > > our trunk till we have pelt contracts working with the dispatcher"? > > > I may have misunderstood, but I thought you said that your changes would > couse problems in trunk and that is why you finally decided to use a > "branch".
Yes and no. Yes if I use the v2 plugins directly, no if I start new plugins. > > The only other thing that worries me is that there are already two > different versions of views in whiteboard, you are now working on a > thir. It is getting very confusing (your title is well deserved ;-). > jeje ;-) I totally understand you and we need to clear out the confusion. Still I think creating 2 new plugins would be quickest and easiest way. I will start clearing the v1 plugins then we have the same number of plugins ;-) wdyt? salu2 > Ross > -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
