Re: XSL for XML to RTF

[Trevor Miller]

Mmm. This is actually quite a bit of work. I don't see any real advantages besides there being one less intermediate step, which means the process should be a lot faster, and since I'm not using Java, I'd have to find an open source library to convert the xml to FO for Borland's Delphi.

On 1/18/06, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Trevor Miller wrote:
> Thanks, but I'm actually looking for a native XSL to perform the
> conversion without having to go to *.FO first. Also this is for a non
> java application, so JFOR is probably not going to help much.
>
> Guess I'll have to code the XSL myself.

Why would you want to do that? It sounds like far more work, what are
the advantages of going directly to RTF?

Ross

--
Real programmers use Linux!