David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
...
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310000&fixfor=12310040
...
The "roadmap" mixes in all of the plugins issues.
The so-called "Priority" is a reporter-based priority.
Does it? I can't check it right now (I'm replying offline) but I'm
pretty sure I moved all of the plugin stuff out of the roadmap for 0.8.
The only references to plugins in there (that I intentionally left) is
to how core handles plugins.
Ah, i did not realise that you were doing that.
However, as we move more stuff into plugins,
what would happen when we have plugins issues
that need to be fixed?
That's where you urgency field comes in (which wasn't available when I
did the 0.8 roadmap).
We also need regularly look at the "unscheduled"
filter and add some to the roadmap. There have
been many new issues added since you did that
initial classification.
I have been watching them carefully and adding those necessary to the 08
roadmap. I may have missed some, i don't claim that this is finished
since it has not been reviewed by the community. But the point is most
of what you say needs to be done has been done. It just needs review. I
have been progressing along this roadmap assuming lazy consensus was in
operation.
We agreed that we needed to have the additional
field called "Urgency" (see earlier in this thread).
You helped to craft the words to explain it and
to define the options. See:
http://forrest.apache.org/issues.html#urgency
Yes, and as new issues have been coming in I have tried to give them an
urgency rating, although I am sure some have slipped through my net.
Ross
