Thorsten Scherler wrote:
El jue, 10-08-2006 a las 04:09 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Author: crossley
Date: Wed Aug 9 21:09:40 2006
New Revision: 430235
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=430235&view=rev
Log:
One demonstration of using Cocoon "running modes" to get a property into xconf.
See FOR-917
I am not sure whether it is a good idea to have yet another properties
system.
The example you added seems to be a wee bit different then the
ForrestConfModule regarding the usage within xconf files. With the
"running modes" for example Cyriaque could implement the dynamic
serializer configuration that he wanted to implement the other day.
However we have now an overkill on properties systems (lm, defaults,
project and runnig modes, did I forgot some?) in forrest and I do not
think that is helping to make forrest simpler and easier to understand.
Shouldn't we consider to focus one only one or two, document them well
and harmonize their usage?
+1, but which one?
Ross
