Hi forrest devs, Here's an opinion of a dev that has been lurking on this list for some time.
I much appreciate the conceptual design of forrest where a single internal format is used as the target of input transformations and as the source of output transformations. However I agree with Ross that there is much unneeded complexity involved in using Forrest relative to the functionality it provides. I currently choose not to debug problems I encounter in Forrest simply because this entails delving into too many seemingly overengineered components with not much relevance to the problem I am trying to solve. Luckily for me, the forrest devs usually quickly fix the problems so that I don't even have to report them. The fact remains however that I would have enjoyed giving something back. This is all to say that I would be happy to contribute to a cleaner implementation of Forrest. Kind regards, Maurice -- No pare, sigue, sigue
