On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:44 PM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We intend to "update" the version of Cocoon used by Forrest > to be Cocoon-2.1 branch. > > Please vote.
I reckon I've missed discussion on why 2.1.x vs the released 2.2? It's not intuitive why we would "upgrade" to an outdated version. I saw FOR-1016 but I didn't see what the show-stopper was. A search turned up this[1] thread with Thorsten concerned about "pass-through" - but I'm not sure what that means. I reckon I'm +0 on doing this simple to be out of our current predicament but think because of how non-intuitive it is, it'd be worth clearly stating why we are not going with the more obvious upgrade path. --tim [1] - http://www.nabble.com/memory-leaks-in-forrest-td18743789.html