Tim Williams wrote: > > This is fairly trivial, but I'm thinking we'd help things by > separating those issues that simply "need to be done as a part of > every release" vs. actual issues targeted at a specific release. I > see two ways to help: > > a) Add a new version with, instead of a "-dev" extension, have "-rel" > suffix. Then, we agree that the workflow is: > a1) "x-dev" issues to zero > a2) code freeze > a3) "x-rel" issues to zero > a4) release > > OR > > b) We add these "need to be done as a part of every release" issues to > a new "Release" component so that they might be easily filtered out. > > Anyway, trivial, but I think the separation is helpful to reviewing > "real" issues vs those that simply need to be done before release.
Good idea. Sorry, i don't know how to decide which way is better. Toss a coin, and just do it. We can always change. -David
