I missed the LICENSE.txt listing again! Geez... Anyway, I thought the
convention was to use ${filename}.license.txt?
--tim
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:15 AM, <cross...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: crossley
> Date: Tue Aug 17 07:15:15 2010
> New Revision: 986211
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986211&view=rev
> Log:
> The commons-cli is now licensed: Apache License 2.0
> Issue: FOR-855 FOR-857
>
> Added:
> forrest/trunk/lib/core/commons-cli.license.txt
> - copied unchanged from r986198,
> forrest/trunk/lib/core/commons-cli-1.2.jar.license.txt
> Removed:
> forrest/trunk/lib/core/commons-cli-1.2.jar.license.txt
> Modified:
> forrest/trunk/LICENSE.txt
>
> Modified: forrest/trunk/LICENSE.txt
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/forrest/trunk/LICENSE.txt?rev=986211&r1=986210&r2=986211&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- forrest/trunk/LICENSE.txt (original)
> +++ forrest/trunk/LICENSE.txt Tue Aug 17 07:15:15 2010
> @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ These supporting products are licensed:
> license: lib/core/avalon-logkit-2.1.jar.license.txt
> license: lib/core/batik-all-1.6.jar.license.txt
> license: lib/core/cocoon.license.txt
> +license: lib/core/commons-cli.license.txt
> license: lib/core/commons-collections-3.2.jar.license.txt
> license: lib/core/commons-httpclient-2.0.2.jar.license.txt
> license: lib/core/commons-io.LICENSE.txt
> @@ -280,7 +281,6 @@ license: lib/core/ehcache-core.license.t
> These supporting products are licensed: Apache Software License, Version 1.1
> license: lib/core/avalon-framework-api-4.3.jar.license.txt
> license: lib/core/avalon-framework-impl-4.3.jar.license.txt
> -license: lib/core/commons-cli-1.0.jar.license.txt
> license: lib/core/excalibur-i18n-1.1.jar.license.txt
> license: lib/core/excalibur-io-1.1.jar.license.txt
> license: lib/core/excalibur-naming-1.0.jar.license.txt
>
>
>
