Saturday, May 5, 2018, 11:24:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > I asked for sudo: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15775
Have you done the OTP stuff? See on: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/try.freemarker.org+maintenance+and+installation > Jacques > > > Le 01/05/2018 à 14:50, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Yes completely forgot about that. I just checked and I have access to the VM. >> >> Since we need to do it ourselves, I'll have a look, hopefully this week >> (very possible) >> >> Cheers >> >> Jacques >> >> >> Le 30/04/2018 à 16:51, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>> Seems this was forgotten. Do you plan to do it? >>> >>> >>> Monday, January 8, 2018, 11:04:31 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Daniel, >>>> >>>> That's a good news. I did not want to get further with >>>> try.freemarker.org waiting for this to happen. Once LetsEncrypt setting is >>>> done a redirection >>>> should be enough >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> Le 08/01/2018 à 09:47, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>>>> Greg commented on the request: >>>>> >>>>> try.freemarker.apache.org now works, and is propagated. >>>>> >>>>> Since that hostname maps to your VM, the certificate to be used for >>>>> try.freemarker.apache.org will need to be hosted/operated by your VM. >>>>> Infra's current policy for project VMs is to use LetsEncrypt for >>>>> certificates. [~pono] will get you set up with that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Wednesday, January 3, 2018, 11:34:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Good, Greg closed INFRA-15476 >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 03/01/2018 à 21:23, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>>>>>> I'm "a bit" late with this, but I have created the issue for it: >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/agent/INFRA/issue/INFRA-15775 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Friday, December 15, 2017, 1:57:04 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To summarize, the opininos were (whether we should switch to >>>>>>>> try.freemarker.apache.org): >>>>>>>> - Daniel Dekany: We better not risk not doing this >>>>>>>> - Jacopo Cappellato: Agrees with me (above) in this >>>>>>>> - Jacques Le Roux: No opinion was expressed, but it's technically fine >>>>>>>> - Ralph Goers: It's certainly not necessary to do >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, unless someone has more to add, I will ask this from Infra in the >>>>>>>> coming days... just to be on the safe side. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wednesday, November 29, 2017, 6:38:05 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The difference is that try.freemarker.org >>>>>>>>> <http://try.freemarker.org/> is a companion site. So long as the >>>>>>>>> main site is freemarker.apache.org I don’t think anyone will complain >>>>>>>>> about a companion site. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ralph >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:33 AM, Jacques Le Roux >>>>>>>>>> <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Ralph, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> IIRW openoffice.org is an exception. There are others, when the >>>>>>>>>> domain was well established before entering the incubator, >>>>>>>>>> subversion.org >>>>>>>>>> comes to mind. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> IMO freemarker.org was well established before entering the >>>>>>>>>> incubator but not try.freemarker.apache.org which is quite recent. >>>>>>>>>> Hence maybe >>>>>>>>>> some caution needed... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My 2 cts >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Le 29/11/2017 à 14:55, Ralph Goers a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I don’t see why there should be a problem as long as >>>>>>>>>>> try.freemarker.org <http://try.freemarker.org/> is an Apache >>>>>>>>>>> controlled >>>>>>>>>>> domain. You aren’t the only project that has a vanity domain. See >>>>>>>>>>> www.openoffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org/> as an example. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ralph >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 1:51 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just as a reminder, I'm planning to request >>>>>>>>>>>> try.freemarker.apache.org, >>>>>>>>>>>> from Infra and then redirect try.freemarker.org to it, because I'm >>>>>>>>>>>> worried that the IPMC will dislike that we use try.freemarker.org >>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>> the canonical address of the online template tester. It will also >>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>> https and a LetsEncrypt certificate (we can't use the *.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> cert on a VM). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, using a sub-sub domains is a bit extreme. I'm not aware of any >>>>>>>>>>>> gotchas in out case, but if anyone is aware some, like LetsEncrypt >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't support them or something, please stop me! (Also, as this >>>>>>>>>>>> way >>>>>>>>>>>> we will receive the cookies of freemarker.apache.org, but >>>>>>>>>>>> certainly we >>>>>>>>>>>> will able to cope with that, if it ever causes a problem.) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Any comments? And do you (especially PPMC members) agree? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Dekany >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> >> > > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
