Progress so far:
CLA has been submitted (and accepted i think?)
Pull request was made (see https://github.com/apache/freemarker/pull/65 )

Regards, Teun

> On 2020-03-30, at 00:33, Teun <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Ahh not yet.
> The company i work for said they'd sign the CCLA but i haven't checked the 
> progress on that lately.
> Will check.
> 
>> On 2020-03-30, at 00:13, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Err.. I mean, the CLA.
>> 
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:12 AM Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Teun,
>>> 
>>> Did you submit the CLI?
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 4:17 PM Teun <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Fixed the two random small things.
>>>> I'll try to submit the CLA request.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards, Teun
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2020-02-24, at 22:04, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> OK, great!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Two random small things that I happened to spot (but eventually I will
>>>> go
>>>>> through all this properly):
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Instead of things like YEARMONTH_FORMAT_KEY_CAMEL_CASE,
>>>>> "yearmonth_format", and "year_month_format", let's use the more
>>>> natural
>>>>> YEAR_MONTH_FORMAT, "year_month_format", and "yearMonthFormat". Same
>>>> for the
>>>>> other temporal types as well. I assume you just tried to be
>>>> consistent with
>>>>> "datetime", but that's actually a mistake (that's the SQL-ish name of
>>>> the
>>>>> type, that somehow get into releases unfortunately... maybe we should
>>>> add
>>>>> date_time etc. as an alias).
>>>>> - String getTemporalFormat(Temporal temporal): Maybe fine for
>>>>> convenience, but the basic overload should be  String
>>>>> getTemporalFormat(Class<? extends Temporal> temporalClass), as this
>>>>> function doesn't really care about the instance.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> When you have the CLA (and are yo sure that your employee can't claim
>>>> this
>>>>> or such), we can merge into the FREEMARKER-35 branch. When it's
>>>> finished,
>>>>> which also means the me or some others here went through it, polished
>>>> it,
>>>>> etc., then it will be merged into the 2.3-gae branch.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Daniel Dekany
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best regards,
>> Daniel Dekany
> 

Reply via email to