Hallo Daniel, thank you very much!! Best Regards Ingo
> On 13. Jun 2024, at 07:43, Daniel Dekany <daniel.dek...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe the application architecture can be improved to avoid this > situation altogether? Because you have a TemplateModel instead of a > plain object, yet you know its exact class (SimpleSequence), so it's > not because it comes from a template, and that's why it's already a > TemplateModel. > > Anyway, if you have to do that, there are a few approaches: > > 1. Copying: DeepUnwrap.unwrap can give you back a "plain" object of > your TemplateModel. Though in case it's a TemplateSequenceModel, it > will create a deep copy into a List, so just for searching it's not > efficient. However, SimpleSequence.toList() often did the same too. > > 2. Adapting: Assuming Configuraton.getObjectWrapper() > (Environment.getObjectWrapper()) is instanceof BeansWrapper (in almost > all applications it is), use ((BeansWrapper) > objectWrapper).unwrap(model, List.class). This doesn't copy, it > creates an adapter. > > 3. Just use the TemplateModel interfaces directly, and iterate through > the sequence with that. Templates do that too, so if you want to be > close to template behavior, that's the way to go. > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 4:22 PM Ingo Mahnke <ingo.mah...@quvion.org> wrote: >> >> Hallo!! As is see "toList()” in SimpleSequence is marked as deprecated. >> I have so search (no change of data) within my SimpleSequence. So how I can >> access the underlying list in a future proof way? >> >> THANK YOU >> Ingo >> >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Daniel Dekany
