Thursday, January 5, 2017, 6:58:40 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote: > Hi, [snip] > Maybe what we could do is the following: > 1) Daniel: do you have access to this account [*]? Or do you know > who could own it? The first step would be to gain access to it
I do have access to that. > 2) Sharan: maybe you could propose some tweets to this list and > then, after community approval, post them there? and maybe, after > the first satisfying ones, you could post them directly and we will > review them and fine tune our messages over time? Maybe... Note that https://twitter.com/freemarker is currently used as a low noise announcement channel. Like a replacement of the now deprecated freemarker-annou...@sourcefirge.net. The 279 subscribers are certainly mostly people who are already very much aware of the existence and features of FreeMarker. So I guess making noise there will be only efficient if it for some reason it spreads over to other social "channels" (via retweets or whatever). Well, certainly I have just stated the obvious, in the eyes of those who used to utilize social media, but whatever... (: > All in all, it would be nice to make some good noise about FreeMarker > > Jacopo > > [*] https://twitter.com/freemarker -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
