Thursday, January 18, 2018, 5:20:23 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Can someone help with this? Especially, Jacopo, do you have the record >> for some events here (see the "date" column of the tables): >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html >> >> I have added some months ago a few dates, like "2015-10-07 (or >> earlier)". That I guess will not be good enough on the >> general@incubator list (and if we are lucky, for the Board). > > > I don't have the exact dates but I am confident that what you have entered > will be fine: the status page is a useful document to get a quick overview > of the status of the project but nothing more than this.
Um... OK. (Or, let that be the biggest problem.) >> Also, I >> have just filled "Add all active committers in the STATUS file" to >> 2015-07-06, based on the SVN commit log of freemarker.xml, while >> "Check that all active committers have submitted a contributors >> agreement" still says "2015-10-07 (or earlier)". Was that initial SVN >> commit done after the contributor aggrements were checked done? > > > Yes, I think you are correct. Since then, all new committers have been > invited only after receiving the ICLA so there is no need to update that > date. No, that means that "Check that all active committers have submitted a contributors agreement" should be modified to "2015-07-06 (or earlier)". >> Does >> "STATUS file" refer to freemarker.xml at all? >> > > Yes, it is the document itself; we have just to make sure that the list in > it is accurate; this is what we have listed in the status page: > > Mentors > jacopoc Jacopo Cappellato > jfclere Jean-Frederic Clere > jonesde David E. Jones > rgoers Ralph Goers > wikier Sergio Fernández > > Committers > ddekany Dániel Dékány > edendramis Evangelia Dendramis > jleroux Jacques Le Roux > nanlei Nan Lei > woonsan Woonsan Ko It's not, as David E. Jones can't be a Mentor as far as he's not an IPMC member. I don't want to generate problems here, but I have seen some signs that tells me that some IPMC members will most certainly express their concerns (and might build a case on it). So, David, can you join the IPMC? I know, it's annoying and all, but rule are rules. >> Yeah, I know, very exciting... ;) but need to be done. >> > > Yeah... excited to be here :-) I think the document is good to go. > > Jacopo > > >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >> -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
