Friday, March 16, 2018, 11:12:40 AM, Angelo zerr wrote: >> I couldn't actually try it yet, as my lsp4e-freemarker build fails > > The installation is a little complex, I think the better thing is that I > provide an update site. Please let me a little time for that. > > Please note too that if you install > https://github.com/mickaelistria/eclipse-bluesky you will benefit with > advanced completion with HTML, CSS, JS too with the ftl. > > I will add a demo in my github for that.
Thanks, great! BTW, I have retweeted you on https://twitter.com/freemarker. Hope you don't mind. > Regard's Angelo > > 2018-03-16 11:06 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org>: > >> Friday, March 16, 2018, 9:21:49 AM, Angelo zerr wrote: >> >> > Hi Daniel, >> > >> > Here the project https://github.com/angelozerr/lsp4e-freemarker which is >> > based on the basic Freemarker Language Server >> > https://github.com/angelozerr/freemarker-languageserver (which could be >> > consumed too in VSCode) which supports only validation for the moment. >> > >> > Hope you will like it. >> >> I couldn't actually try it yet, as my lsp4e-freemarker build fails >> with: >> >> Could not resolve target platform specification artifact >> org.eclipse.lsp4e-freemarker:target-platform:target:0.1.0-SNAPSHOT >> >> What's supposed to generate and install that artifact? (Surely I have >> near 0 investment in Eclipse plugin development; it seems to be its >> own little universe with Tycho and all.) >> >> I guess to generate an "update site" (p2 repo or whatever the correct >> term is) a Maven module with <packaging>eclipse-repository</packaging> >> will have to be added. >> >> Otherwise so far so good, but of course the question will be if how >> flexible this setup is. Especially the syntax highlighting can be >> tricky, as FreeMarker templates my use various syntax permutations >> (<#...> VS [#...], ${...} VS [=...]), then the static text part can be >> HTLM or XML or something else. So I wonder how that can be handled. >> Not to mention syntax auto-detection from the [#ftl] header. In any >> case, developing a TextMate syntax for a few permutations might be >> useful, as TextMate and VSCode users can use it as well. >> >> > Regard's Angelo >> > >> > 2018-03-15 22:00 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org>: >> > >> >> Thursday, March 15, 2018, 1:58:31 PM, Angelo zerr wrote: >> >> >> >> > Ok thanks Daniel for your answer. >> >> > >> >> > I will try to create a github project with my POC which provides: >> >> > >> >> > * syntax coloration for Freemarker by using TextMate >> >> > * validation by using a basic Freemarker Language Server (based on >> >> lsp4j) >> >> > which should work with Eclipse, VSCode, etc >> >> >> >> Sounds like a great start! >> >> >> >> > 2018-03-14 22:34 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org>: >> >> > >> >> >> Wednesday, March 14, 2018, 4:41:36 PM, Angelo zerr wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi all, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Do you want that I create a new eclipse plugin with Freemarker >> based >> >> on >> >> >> tm4e >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Here the result with syntax coloration: >> >> >> >> >> >> Seems to me that the image was removed by the mailing list. But >> >> >> otherwise of course it's good if we have it started, however I can't >> >> >> promise that it will be picked up and continued by someone. Surely I >> >> >> will check it out though. >> >> >> >> >> >> > Regard's Angelo >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > 2018-03-14 12:20 GMT+01:00 Jacopo Cappellato < >> >> >> jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org >> > >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> It's our turn. I'm really just waiting to hear if the other PPMC >> >> >> >> members think that this should be attempted (like, if we want that >> >> >> >> code at all), then I will ask ASF Legal. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I don't feel much comfortable in commenting on license/legal stuff >> >> >> because >> >> >> > of my lack of confidence on the subject >> >> >> > However I think that we can start by stating our interest in >> accepting >> >> >> the >> >> >> > codebase donation from RedHat/JBoss. >> >> >> > Then we could figure out the exact steps that need to be followed >> by >> >> them >> >> >> > and by us (trying to minimize the workload n their part as much as >> >> >> > possible) and then we will decide if it is a feasible plan. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Jacopo >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Daniel Dekany >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> Daniel Dekany >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >> -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
