Hi Phil, First I hope you had a good start in 2009, did you? Regarding "reverse search" (looking for md5 of every file in fs) as in the last script, should I revert that? It consumes much more time this way and its no problem for replacing that to the use of fsvs st -v, I only tried doing this way because of sorting files to the belonging WC. That it's not possible by design to have underlaying $WAA i wasnt aware off. When using "fsvs status -v $WC" will this work - new version of fsvs on old WAA style?
Best Rgds, Gunnar Philipp Marek wrote: > Hello Gunnar! > > On Saturday 13 December 2008 Gunnar Thielebein wrote: > >> good to know that the script works in some way like you want it to. >> Regarding DEBUG output thats a good idea and I implemented that first. >> > Fube, > > >> For compatibility I would like to keep the script sh conform. >> > Ok. > > >> Can you say what needs to be done for rewriting ignore patterns. >> > The lowercase letters at the start must be substituted by > the keywords; I have attached the current documentation for the patterns, > please look at "Modifiers". > > >> Regarding the PREFIX_ONE / PREFIX_TWO i used this, because first >> approach was of moving PREFIX_ONE directory. This is now removed, as >> i've rewritten some parts. >> > Ok. > > >> What I do now is to check all files/dirs in wc-path to dir-structure in >> FSVS_WAA. Before I do a reverse sort so that deepest path in tree is >> taken first. >> So i can keep sure that files are not moved to the wrong (parental) >> working copy. I also added some exclude directory handling for speed-up >> the search. >> > I don't think that's necessary - as soon as two working copies are nested, > and > have the same file versioned, the WAA paths will have collided - and then > there's already a problem. > > So, if you find two WCs where one is above another, and files are shared, you > could print a warning. (But that's low priority, lets get the other things > working.) > > >> For some things like animation :-) and a better option handling I need a >> little more time. Its only a draftstate for me to get sure this is right >> direction, and my experience is still script-kiddie ;-) . >> Although many thanks for honoring the work. >> > Well, it seems "good enough" :-) > And I'm happy if I can offload some work, so that I can blame others, too ;-) > > > Many thanks again! > > > Regards, > > Phil > > ------------------------------------------------------ http://fsvs.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=3923&dsMessageId=1012028 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
