> On Feb. 16, 2017, 12:28 a.m., Kevin Duling wrote:
> > Do you mean to be checking in with TODO comments?

Yes. These are further changes I think need to be made to NetstatFunction to 
harden it. We also need to add streaming to fix GEODE-2488 (OOME) but I didn't 
see an obvious place to add a TODO for that.


- Kirk


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56734/#review165787
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 16, 2017, 12:23 a.m., Kirk Lund wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56734/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 16, 2017, 12:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Jinmei Liao, Jared Stewart, John Blum, Kevin 
> Duling, and Ken Howe.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GEODE-2474
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2474
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> GEODE-2474: refactor code to use SystemUtils to read OS system props
> 
> Centralize OS system property reading in SystemUtils.
> 
> Refactor NetstatFunction and GemFireVersion to use SystemUtils.
> 
> Fix use of netstat and lsof on Mac OS.
> 
> Add TODOs for future cleanup of NetstatFunction.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/GemFireVersion.java 
> 26d4fb3c5705bffdcdbbc6c261dbe9ffd297642e 
>   geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/lang/SystemUtils.java 
> 66c158c93fecac4feb2da56f617f5efc7bba56e1 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/management/internal/cli/functions/NetstatFunction.java
>  c435e04dc50ccae50c1008d1153797bbc6ff30f4 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/internal/lang/SystemUtilsJUnitTest.java
>  48f176eabc18d3ffa56daaa7da12634a9554f39d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56734/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> precheckin passed
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kirk Lund
> 
>

Reply via email to