+1 for marking it experimental and going ahead with changing it. -Dan
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Stolz <mst...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 to marking it experimental now > > Once we do that I think it will be fine for the community to make breaking > changes to it if we need to. > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager > Mobile: +1-631-835-4771 > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Galen M O'Sullivan <gosulli...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I think that we should mark the Redis adapter as experimental. This > > functionality comes from the initial code grant from GemFire. It is > > mentioned in the "Experimental" section of the GemFire docs [1], and as > far > > as I can tell, the only reason it hasn't been marked as experimental in > > Geode is because no one put the annotation on when the @Experimental tag > > was introduced. > > > > The Redis adapter's performance on collection operations is pretty bad > > (think 1% of Redis on a single-server configuration), and there are some > > bugs outstanding (for example, [2]), so I don't think it's really ready > for > > general use. > > > > What do you all think? Is anyone out there using the Redis adapter? > Should > > it be considered breaking to change it just because it's been released > when > > it wasn't marked experimental? Should we just go ahead and change it > > already? > > > > Thanks, > > Galen > > > > [1]: http://gemfire.docs.pivotal.io/geode/tools_modules/redis_ > adapter.html > > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2473 > > >
