[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16032221#comment-16032221
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-3013:
---------------------------------------

Github user ladyVader commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/552
  
    Actually, with this change, I'm still seeing these log messages in testing, 
so retracting this pull request.


> Reduce logging level for FunctionExceptions : 
> InternalFunctionInvocationTargetException: Multiple target nodes found for 
> single hop operation
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-3013
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3013
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: lucene
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0
>            Reporter: Shelley Lynn Hughes-Godfrey
>            Assignee: Shelley Lynn Hughes-Godfrey
>
> The following exception should not be logged as a warning with a full stack 
> dump (as it is not actionable by the user).
> Changing this to debug log level.
> {noformat}
> Multiple target nodes found for single hop operation
> [warning 2017/04/04 14:53:06.031 PDT bridgegemfire1_monaco_15778 
> <ServerConnection on port 23318 Thread 8> tid=0x98] Exception on server while 
> executing function : 
> org.apache.geode.cache.lucene.internal.distributed.LuceneQueryFunction
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.execute.InternalFunctionInvocationTargetException:
>  Multiple target nodes found for single hop operation
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.PartitionedRegion.executeOnBucketSet(PartitionedRegion.java:3684)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.PartitionedRegion.executeFunction(PartitionedRegion.java:3344)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.execute.PartitionedRegionFunctionExecutor.executeFunction(PartitionedRegionFunctionExecutor.java:225)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.execute.AbstractExecution.execute(AbstractExecution.java:563)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.tier.sockets.command.ExecuteRegionFunctionSingleHop.cmdExecute(ExecuteRegionFunctionSingleHop.java:264)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.tier.sockets.BaseCommand.execute(BaseCommand.java:141)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.tier.sockets.ServerConnection.doNormalMsg(ServerConnection.java:783)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.tier.sockets.ServerConnection.doOneMessage(ServerConnection.java:914)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.tier.sockets.ServerConnection.run(ServerConnection.java:1171)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.tier.sockets.AcceptorImpl$1$1.run(AcceptorImpl.java:519)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to