Github user jinmeiliao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/589#discussion_r123818259
--- Diff:
geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/execute/FunctionContextImpl.java
---
@@ -37,20 +38,25 @@
private String functionId = null;
+ private Cache cache = null;
+
private ResultSender resultSender = null;
private final boolean isPossDup;
public FunctionContextImpl(final String functionId, final Object args,
ResultSender resultSender) {
- this.functionId = functionId;
- this.args = args;
- this.resultSender = resultSender;
- this.isPossDup = false;
+ this(null, functionId, args, resultSender, false);
+ }
+
+ public FunctionContextImpl(final Cache cache, final String functionId,
final Object args,
+ ResultSender resultSender) {
+ this(cache, functionId, args, resultSender, false);
}
- public FunctionContextImpl(final String functionId, final Object args,
ResultSender resultSender,
- boolean isPossibleDuplicate) {
+ public FunctionContextImpl(final Cache cache, final String functionId,
final Object args,
+ ResultSender resultSender, boolean isPossibleDuplicate) {
--- End diff --
we can't remove GemFireCacheImpl.getInstance() for now, that's the way we
are getting the instance to create the FunctionContext in the first place, why
not just use it to avoid making more constructor changes. This just my 2 cents.
I can go either way on this though.
The problem this changeset is trying to solve is that if external developer
can not use GemfireCacheImpl.getInstance() to get the cache since it's an
internal api, they can only use CacheFactory.getAnyIntance() and that's a
synchronized static, so it requires a lock on CachFactory which creates some
deadlocks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
