Github user kirklund commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/672#discussion_r130944162 --- Diff: geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/management/internal/cli/commands/DataCommandsUtils.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license + * agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for additional information regarding + * copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a + * copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License + * is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express + * or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under + * the License. + */ + +package org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.commands; + +import java.util.ArrayList; +import java.util.HashSet; +import java.util.Iterator; +import java.util.List; +import java.util.Set; +import java.util.StringTokenizer; + +import org.apache.commons.collections.CollectionUtils; +import org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils; + +import org.apache.geode.LogWriter; +import org.apache.geode.cache.Region; +import org.apache.geode.cache.execute.FunctionService; +import org.apache.geode.cache.execute.ResultCollector; +import org.apache.geode.distributed.DistributedMember; +import org.apache.geode.internal.cache.InternalCache; +import org.apache.geode.management.DistributedRegionMXBean; +import org.apache.geode.management.ManagementService; +import org.apache.geode.management.cli.Result; +import org.apache.geode.management.internal.MBeanJMXAdapter; +import org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.CliUtil; +import org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.LogWrapper; +import org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.domain.DataCommandRequest; +import org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.domain.DataCommandResult; +import org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.functions.DataCommandFunction; +import org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.i18n.CliStrings; +import org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.result.CompositeResultData; +import org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.result.ResultBuilder; +import org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.result.TabularResultData; + +public class DataCommandsUtils { --- End diff -- I would prefer to avoid *Utils classes as well. It's reasonable to introduce it as a temporary refactoring though just to facilitate breaking DataCommands up into multiple Command classes. At some point, we should try to refactor DataCommandUtils to non-static OO classes. Unfortunately I don't have any examples for changing DataCommandUtils to OO off the top of my head. That code is going to require some studying to figure out how to properly organize it. I guess my recommendation at this point is to pull in these changes as they are and then @jaredjstewart @YehEmily @jinmeiliao and myself could get together and mob on restructuring DataCommandUtils. Thoughts?
--- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---