Well, we could run it periodically such as weekly rather than as part of the main pipeline or precheckin.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Aditya Anchuri <aanch...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1, although I do wonder about the overhead of making PRs increasing more > than it already feels like to me as a new contributor (as the person who > made the geospatial contribution). If this was a gradle task maybe like > spotless? > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > I'd like to see LGTM run on pull requests. Otherwise I think we're > > fighting a losing battle trying to improve the quality of our code. For > > instance, we just had a nice contribution of geospatial functionality > > that raised 5 alerts, but we only found out about it after the code was > > merged to develop. > > > > LGTM allows that kind of integration but you have to be the repo "owner" > > to set it up. > > > > > > https://lgtm.com/projects/g/apache/geode/ > > > > > > >
