Hey Jake, It makes sense. I personally prefer to gather feedback through the Wiki to keep everything in one single place, *but* I've explicitly mentioned the two options as acceptable because this particular proposal already got feedback through both communication channels *and* we haven't settled on a standard yet. I'd rather get feedback in any way and aggregate everything on my own than maybe not getting anything because I'm explicitly limiting the options to provide it. Cheers.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 3:40 PM Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > On Jun 24, 2019, at 11:35 AM, Juan José Ramos <jra...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > Please take some time to review it thoroughly, adding comments and/or > > concerns either to the *Wiki page [1]* or this email thread directly, all > > feedback is more than welcome. > > Let’s try to keep the conversation in one medium or the other. Author’s > pick since we haven’t settled on a standard. See conversation about RFC-0 > https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/3706 < > https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/3706>. > > > -- Juan José Ramos Cassella Senior Technical Support Engineer Email: jra...@pivotal.io Office#: +353 21 4238611 Mobile#: +353 87 2074066 After Hours Contact#: +1 877 477 2269 Office Hours: Mon - Thu 08:30 - 17:00 GMT. Fri 08:30 - 16:00 GMT How to upload artifacts: https://support.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/204369073 How to escalate a ticket: https://support.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/203809556 [image: support] <https://support.pivotal.io/> [image: twitter] <https://twitter.com/pivotal> [image: linkedin] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/3048967> [image: facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/pivotalsoftware> [image: google plus] <https://plus.google.com/+Pivotal> [image: youtube] <https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAdzTan_eSPScpj2J50ErtzR9ANSzv3kl>
