Good find. I agree that it’s fine since it’s not a user implemented interface.
> On Sep 19, 2019, at 1:20 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes > <alberto.bustamante.re...@est.tech> wrote: > > Hi, > > During PR review of GEODE-6871 it was found that GEODE-5222 introduced a > backward compatibility issue by adding a new method to a public interface > without providing a default implementation. > According to comments in the PR, although the impacted interface > (DiskStoreMXBean) is public, it should not be implemented by applications, so > the risk of breaking backward compatibility is low, but it exists. > > Do you think this issue should be fixed in 1.10? > > BR/ > > Alberto
