+1 !! On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:42 AM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1 > > Awesome!!! > > -Dan > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:33 AM Owen Nichols <onich...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > It makes total sense that gfsh should depend on core, and core should be > > completely unaware of it. The dependency untangling that results will > also > > help pave the way for other interfaces, such as a gfsh-free management > REST > > interface. > > > > > > > On Nov 22, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > > +100. Would be a great move. > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Jens Deppe <jensde...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > >> Hello All, > > >> > > >> We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its > > own > > >> gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > >> artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any > > Spring > > >> dependencies. > > >> > > >> The proposal is outlined here: > > >> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > >> > > >> Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and > > not in > > >> the comment section of the proposal page. > > >> > > >> The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > >> > > >> Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > >> > > >> --Jens & Patrick > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers > > > > > > Jinmei > > > > >
