Looks good to me. Fixing broken implementation and providing reliable HA can only be a good thing. My only concern is the backwards compatibility issue, but I don't know if we make any guarantees regarding that for experimental features, so it may be a non-issue.
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:35 AM Raymond Ingles <ring...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Just a quick nudge - we set a deadline for comments for tomorrow. Anyone > had a chance to look this over yet? Thanks! > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:09 PM Raymond Ingles <ring...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The current Redis API support in Geode has been marked experimental for a > > couple years and has several bugs and inconsistencies compared to native > > Redis. We created a RFC for updating the Geode Redis API support, to > > address issues in the implementation, improve performance and add High > > Availability support. > > > > Please review and comment by 5/8/2020. > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Redis+API+Improvements > > > > Thanks! > > >
