Re: [PROPOSAL] Backport usability improvements to support 1.13 branch

[Dan Smith]

+1 - I had a question on the PR itself about how we're merging these.

-Dan
________________________________
From: Joris Melchior <jmelch...@vmware.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 8:13 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Backport usability improvements to support 1.13 branch

+1

On 2020-09-23, 7:23 PM, "Jason Huynh" <jhu...@vmware.com> wrote:

    Hello,

    I’d like to merge the pull request: 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fgeode%2Fpull%2F5524&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cdasmith%40vmware.com%7C07a555320cbd4d6f943a08d8609c7569%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C1%7C637365572383970684&amp;sdata=qfpuzsR8VdYuv1GS3KKHVztAFX0S5yVITEW8b6oigoQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
 into a support 1.13 branch.  The commits are focused on a few usability 
improvements for Geode that were thought to have made it into 1.13 but actually 
did not make it.

    What this pull request back ports:

      *   GEODE-8203: Logging to std out along with to the regular log file
      *   GEODE-8283: Rest API for disk store creation
      *   GEODE-8200: Fix for Rebalance API stuck “IN_PROGRESS” state forever 
and GEODE-8200: Enhance GfshRule
      *   GEODE-8241: Locator observers locator-wait-time
      *   GEODE-8078: Log and report error at the correct place


    The PR pipeline is failing due to Redis tests (that I don’t think are on 
1.13).  Everything else appears to be passing.

    Thanks,
    -Jason