Can we please agree to send requests for inclusion directly to onich...@vmware.com<mailto:onich...@vmware.com> rather than back to this thread.
On Mar 4, 2022, at 1:09 PM, Owen Nichols <onich...@vmware.com<mailto:onich...@vmware.com>> wrote: Thanks Udo, I have added kohlmu-pivotal as requested, for non-draft PRs only. From: Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@vmware.com<mailto:u...@vmware.com>> Date: Friday, March 4, 2022 at 1:03 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org<mailto:dev@geode.apache.org> <dev@geode.apache.org<mailto:dev@geode.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Commit message review opt-in I’ll opt-in please. --Udo From: Owen Nichols <onich...@vmware.com<mailto:onich...@vmware.com>> Date: Saturday, February 26, 2022 at 10:44 AM To: geode <dev@geode.apache.org<mailto:dev@geode.apache.org>> Subject: Commit message review opt-in If you received an automated-looking PR review comment from onichols-pivotal in the past few weeks without consent, I apologize and have withdrawn it. If you would like to continue receiving these automated reviews, you may opt-in by emailing me your github username (also let me know if you want your Draft PRs included or not). Geode’s guidelines for commit messages should be interpreted as suggestions, not rules. All Geode committers are welcomed with "we like to work on trust, not unnecessary restrictions". I hope this change to opt-in better reflects that spirit.
