On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Anthony Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On May 8, 2015, at 4:48 PM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 2. A typical ASF way for signaling that you would like to >>> contribute something is to open up a JIRA and follow up >>> with the patch. What about our Github integration? I'd suggest >>> the following: anytime a PR comes, a committers who is >>> interested in helping to get the patch in opens up a corresponding >>> JIRA. That way we can have a central source of truth >>> on ASF JIRA while still enabling the workflow. >>> >> > > I think the benefit of using the GH integration outweighs the cost of adopting > both processes. If we find that it’s not working out we can always adjust. > I want to bias towards making it as easy as possible for people to contribute > ideas and code.
That is, in fact, a great point. That's exactly what I was trying to get out of this thread: a simple, minimalistic agreement to get us going. The simpler -- the easier it is to evolve. I'll document the process on a wiki shortly and will test drive with a few JIRAs over the weekend. Thanks, Roman.
