-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39605/#review103824
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/NetView.java
 (line 155)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39605/#comment161924>

    yes, please add it


- Bruce Schuchardt


On Oct. 23, 2015, 6:10 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39605/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 23, 2015, 6:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Bruce Schuchardt, Jianxia Chen, 
> and Lynn Gallinat.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> It looks like the coordinator node has left, sent a leave message but the 
> member that is supposed to become coordinator next, ignores this leave 
> message (as he is not yet the coordinator).
> The fix is to not ignore these leave messages and instead have each member 
> track them, similar to removedMembers list. When the leave message is 
> processed by non coordinators, the results will be the same. However if the 
> non coordinator will now become coordinator, they can now process these leave 
> messages
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/NetView.java
>  cb61a1b 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/fd/GMSHealthMonitor.java
>  ed9f214 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/membership/GMSJoinLeave.java
>  57611e6 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/membership/GMSJoinLeaveJUnitTest.java
>  42594cf 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39605/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran precheckin but had a handful of failures due to suspect strings, will 
> rerun
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>

Reply via email to