Thanks for the responses! (1) and (2) are answered/ closed. For (3), you're right - doesn't matter too much for a Java project though the parallel (documentation) thread has captured relevant discussion.
So in conclusion, we can: - List the JDK(s) and all the platforms that the code has been tested with - JDK 1.8_XX, OpenJDK 1.8_XX, Linux CentOS 6+, Ubuntu 10+, RHEL, Windows 2008-2012, OS X (dev) - List other (potential) OSes and environments that JDKs are supported on, with the disclaimer that is hasn't been tested, or extensively tested - We should probably put a note about virtualization/ docker support as well -Nitin ________________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 8:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Geode 1.0.0 (alpha1): Open questions On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Nitin Lamba <[email protected]> wrote: > Wanted to start a thread capturing all the open (mostly process) questions > for the first alpha1 release: > > > - Does ASF have Pivotal's (or EMC's, VMware's, Gemstone's) CCLA on file? Who > can confirm? > This is a legal requirement See what Niall said, but yes Pivotal does have CCLA on file. > - Is the alternate (podling) release > process<http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html#manifest-usage> > available to Geode? Doesn't look like a popular method but may have > advantages to partially automate the > release manifest through the existing build process I will advise strongly against using it for the *first* release. Subsequent releases are fair game for the alt. process. > - What target build platforms (OS, etc) should be included in this release? > Echoing the same question that was asked by Karen Miller regarding > installation documents Does it really matter that much for a Java project? Thanks, Roman.
