There's another review request for close part code changes.
https://reviewboard.gemstone.com/r/3761/

GEODE-669 is just created.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41332/#review110274
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Can you file a JIRA for this?
>
> Also, would it make sense to add this sort of logic to Cache.getRegion? It
> seems like there might be other code that is expecting to find a region
> that previously existed, and the only reason that it is gone is because of
> a shut down all.
>
> - Dan Smith
>
>
> On Dec. 14, 2015, 1:06 a.m., xiaojian zhou wrote:
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/41332/
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > (Updated Dec. 14, 2015, 1:06 a.m.)
> >
> >
> > Review request for geode and Dan Smith.
> >
> >
> > Repository: geode
> >
> >
> > Description
> > -------
> >
> > We need a cacheobserver for ShutdownAll.
> >
> > GatewayReceiverCommand will find the region of events will be null when
> shutdownall is on-going. In this case, it will throw
> CacheDestroyedException (i.e. subclass of CancelException) instead of
> RegionDestroyedException.
> >
> >
> > Diffs
> > -----
> >
> >
>  
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/CacheObserver.java
> 9cd6c28
> >
>  
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/CacheObserverAdapter.java
> 82c4507
> >
>  
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/GemFireCacheImpl.java
> 27bb813
> >
>  
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/tier/sockets/command/GatewayReceiverCommand.java
> 6d252e4
> >
> > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41332/diff/
> >
> >
> > Testing
> > -------
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > xiaojian zhou
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to