-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42822/#review116478
-----------------------------------------------------------




gemfire-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java
 (line 2165)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42822/#comment177495>

    There is a pauseSender() and pauseSenderAndWaitForDispatcherToPause(). You 
just made the 2 methods identical. 
    
    Was that purposely using pauseSender() here?
    
    Others look good.


- xiaojian zhou


On Jan. 26, 2016, 8:47 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42822/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 26, 2016, 8:47 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Barry Oglesby and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> For parallel queues, there is a actually a separate conflation thread
> that removes entries from the queue on conflation. The tests need to
> wait for this thread to finish it's work.
> 
> As part of this change, I refactored the ParallelWANConflationDUnitTest
> to remove a bunch of duplicate code, replaced the VM.invoke(String)
> calls with lambdas, and scaled the test down to create fewer buckets and
> do fewer puts so that it runs in 1/4 of the time.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> gemfire-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java
>  230c8d8ce6f903cf5e4b9c8bf42b87ca04271647 
>   
> gemfire-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/parallel/ParallelWANConflationDUnitTest.java
>  4acaaf4c5f24123db335e39ea56592717c9ea17c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42822/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan Smith
> 
>

Reply via email to