> On Jan 26, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Niall Pemberton <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Can the year on the copyright in both the source & binary NOTICE file also > be updated for RC2?
Yes we can!
>
> Theres no issue with distributing jopt-simple & JSON from a license PoV,
> but policy on this is unclear to me. As a principle the ASF doesn't release
> other people/project's code when they haven't donated it to the ASF, but at
> the same time alot of releases contain files that were not donated. As a
> good open source citizen, we should work with the jopt-simple project
> rather than forking releasing their code. However, it seems fine to me that
> its dealt with during incubation rather than specifically for this release.
>
Thanks for adding your perspective and FWIW I completely agree.
> So yes, the strategy outlined for RC2 makes sense to me.
>
> Niall
>
So for spinning an RC2 we have the following changes to pull into the
release/1.0.0-incubating.M1 branch:
1) Update instructions in README.md (GEODE-769)
commits:
2609946d8863d4e576820ac92d4318fd5f295b5a
9b74f89bbd64cc8a90cf256ad1af2466e21c6388
2) Update copyright publication year in src/bin NOTICE files (GEODE-815)
commit:
80971d5250f7bc6fe3341d04c249cbee261dab0d
3) Include Spring, Netty in binary NOTICE file (GEODE-610)
commit:
TBD…there’s still some discussion happening on this issue. Comments
welcome!
Let’s try to wrap up the discussion on GEODE-610 so we can cut the RC tomorrow.
Thanks,
Anthony
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
