If we choose to proceed in this direction, we'll need a
community-accessible site that hosts a public Google calendar. Does this
already exist, or do we need to create one?


On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:28 PM, William Markito <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The javascript integration you did looks really good to me...  Although the
> Brazilian calendar might be too much given the number of holidays... :P
>
> A separate website would be a bit confusing since it would not be handled
> or managed within the project or by committers of the project, which might
> be a similar problem for a google calendar but might more doable...
>
> About your second question the calendar widget would take of it once the
> events pass.  For now, I'm not sure we need to be much concerned since it's
> also good for people to see events that already happened so they can find
> content...
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:13 PM Dave Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This was a proof-of-concept, but the redesign needs more thought. I
> think a
> > separate site will allow more flexibility in presentation and design.
> >
> > I'm not sure how much information most publicly-visible Google calendars
> > provide, but this example's pretty slim. Doesn't begin to rival the
> > appearance or level of detail of the existing implementation.
> >
> > Those of us who care need to come up with a design. My first question has
> > to do with existing resources:
> > Is there a website already in existence that could serve as a host for
> > calendar postings from the community?
> >
> > Second question: In the meantime, how shall we handle updates to the
> > existing site? The Jan 31 event will go 'stale' in less than a week.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Good idea!
> > >
> > > -Dan
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Greg Chase <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for supporting Brazilian Holidays
> > > >
> > > > +1 for a calendar service that makes it easier for the community to
> > > > contribute events.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Dave Barnes <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > First pass, using the calendar of Brazilian Holidays - look just
> > below
> > > > the
> > > > > Pivotal events:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> http://ec2-52-33-216-127.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/community/
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Nitin Lamba <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for data-driven event calendar! William's suggested solution
> is
> > > > > > available as a jQuery plugin [1].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nitin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.jqueryscript.net/social-media/jQuery-Plugin-To-Display-Google-Calendar-Feeds-On-Your-Website.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ________________________________________
> > > > > > From: William Markito <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 12:00 AM
> > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Proposal: Move Events to a non-Repo website
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Dave,  I think it's a great idea!  In fact, I'd rather have it
> > > some
> > > > > how
> > > > > > (javascript ?) pull that data from a Google Calendar feed or
> > > something
> > > > > like
> > > > > > that to automate the updates.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM Dave Barnes <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > RFF (Request for Feedback)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Apache Geode website design suggestion: Replace the volatile
> > Events
> > > > > > section
> > > > > > > of the Geode website with a link to a community events site
> > that's
> > > > not
> > > > > > part
> > > > > > > of the Apache Geode source code repo. That way, the events can
> be
> > > > > updated
> > > > > > > quickly by community members without the delay, overhead, and
> > > > potential
> > > > > > > code corruption resulting from updating calendar items in the
> > code
> > > > > repo.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to