-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43788/#review119990
-----------------------------------------------------------




gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/fd/GMSHealthMonitor.java
 (line 452)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43788/#comment181350>

    Better add a {} for this if statement



gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/fd/GMSHealthMonitor.java
 (line 488)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43788/#comment181351>

    Better add a {} for this if statement



gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/fd/GMSHealthMonitorJUnitTest.java
 (line 682)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43788/#comment181355>

    return super.doTCPCheckMember(suspectMember, port)?


- Jianxia Chen


On Feb. 19, 2016, 10:47 p.m., Hitesh Khamesra wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43788/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 19, 2016, 10:47 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Bruce Schuchardt, Jianxia Chen, and Udo Kohlmeyer.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> While doing tcp check, now we do request heartbeat from unresponsive member. 
> This is udp call and we don't wait for response. It is processed by another 
> thread. Current thread continue with tcp check and if it fails, then it look 
> for heartbeat.
> 
> Added unit test
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/fd/GMSHealthMonitor.java
>  beb781d 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/fd/GMSHealthMonitorJUnitTest.java
>  9562e41 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43788/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> testing
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hitesh Khamesra
> 
>

Reply via email to