-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46239/#review129067
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- xiaojian zhou


On April 15, 2016, 12:16 a.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46239/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 15, 2016, 12:16 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, nabarun nag, Dan 
> Smith, and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Not sure if this is needed at this point, but with this new unit test it gets 
> slightly more coverage in a fraction of the time (takes 2 seconds on my 
> laptop for 18 tests) it takes to run LuceneServiceImplJUnitTest (9 seconds 
> for 5 tests).  None of the cache calls are on a real cache so that gives some 
> speed savings, although as you can see, the difference is only in seconds at 
> this point.
> 
> Allows ability to test that double initialize calls do not invoke multiple 
> file region creates (which may have been hard to test before or is this case 
> even possible?)
> 
> refactored LuceneIndexForPartitionRegion so that a unit test for it could 
> test specific units, but also allowing tests for initialize() to be stubbed 
> out.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/LuceneIndexForPartitionedRegion.java
>  25b63a4 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/LuceneIndexForPartitionedRegionTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46239/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>

Reply via email to