> On July 26, 2016, 5:02 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> > Looks good - but this does mean that the build id will always be 0 unless 
> > someone sets it, whereas before it was the current date. Will that be an 
> > issue?

AFAIK, the buildId is only used in GemFireVersion.properties.  That file 
already has a more useful build date embedded.


- Anthony


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50436/#review143552
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 26, 2016, 4:56 p.m., Anthony Baker wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/50436/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 26, 2016, 4:56 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Dick Cavender, Mark Bretl, and Dan Smith.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Extract the product name and org into gradle.properties.
> 
> GEODE-1695: Add buildId to gradle.properties
> 
> 
> GEODE-1695: Use productName to build javadocs
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   extensions/geode-modules-assembly/build.gradle 
> 412ba096b74b5de4bf6af2b09f66774f4fdf00ed 
>   geode-assembly/build.gradle c410f594dac3ac315c0eed2ff8c00d9f061ed473 
>   geode-core/build.gradle 030885eae9f681b4438faebe787091929b35ce4a 
>   gradle.properties 0fa3765d1b49b7c7f193d8fcb05c328e594a3f11 
>   gradle/java.gradle 4acb4da8a8a3da686d6ba10a8a8d57ac7fa375be 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50436/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anthony Baker
> 
>

Reply via email to