I just made a change to upgrade jackson and scala module to 2.8.2

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Speaking of jackson, anyone know why we’re not using v2.2.0 for the scala
> module?  This is a dependency of geode-web-api.
>
> jackson.version = 2.2.0
> jackson-module-scala_2.10.version = 2.1.5
>
>
> Anthony
>
> > On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:32 AM, John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > +1 to standardizing Geode on Jackson for JSON processing.
> >
> > +1 to using JsonPath/json-path-assert for testing interactions in Geode
> on
> > JSON docs.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, we should change all json parsing code to use jackson. However, we
> >> still need to write unit tests and that's what json-path-assert is for.
> >> I've researched all of the ways to perform json assertions for unit
> tests
> >> and test-path-assert is currently the best. It's from com.jayway same as
> >> Awaitility.
> >>
> >> -Kirk
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can we get rid of TypedJson in favor of some standard json libraries?
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> To support fixing up unit tests that involve json, I'd like to add in
> a
> >>>> dependency on com.jayway.jsonpath:json-path-assert.
> >>>>
> >>>> We already have a dependency on com.jayway.jsonpath:json-path (for
> >>>> spring-hateoas). json-path-assert basically adds some new Hamcrest
> >>> matchers
> >>>> for clean assertions involving json.
> >>>>
> >>>> I intend to use this in TypedJsonJUnitTest (GEODE-1842) because that
> >>>> test doesn't currently have assertions(!).
> >>>>
> >>>> -Kirk
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Cheers
> >>>
> >>> Jinmei
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -John
> > 503-504-8657
> > john.blum10101 (skype)
>
>


-- 
Cheers

Jinmei

Reply via email to