I just made a change to upgrade jackson and scala module to 2.8.2 On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Speaking of jackson, anyone know why we’re not using v2.2.0 for the scala > module? This is a dependency of geode-web-api. > > jackson.version = 2.2.0 > jackson-module-scala_2.10.version = 2.1.5 > > > Anthony > > > On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:32 AM, John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > +1 to standardizing Geode on Jackson for JSON processing. > > > > +1 to using JsonPath/json-path-assert for testing interactions in Geode > on > > JSON docs. > > > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Yes, we should change all json parsing code to use jackson. However, we > >> still need to write unit tests and that's what json-path-assert is for. > >> I've researched all of the ways to perform json assertions for unit > tests > >> and test-path-assert is currently the best. It's from com.jayway same as > >> Awaitility. > >> > >> -Kirk > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> > >>> Can we get rid of TypedJson in favor of some standard json libraries? > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> To support fixing up unit tests that involve json, I'd like to add in > a > >>>> dependency on com.jayway.jsonpath:json-path-assert. > >>>> > >>>> We already have a dependency on com.jayway.jsonpath:json-path (for > >>>> spring-hateoas). json-path-assert basically adds some new Hamcrest > >>> matchers > >>>> for clean assertions involving json. > >>>> > >>>> I intend to use this in TypedJsonJUnitTest (GEODE-1842) because that > >>>> test doesn't currently have assertions(!). > >>>> > >>>> -Kirk > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Cheers > >>> > >>> Jinmei > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > -John > > 503-504-8657 > > john.blum10101 (skype) > > -- Cheers Jinmei
