+1 for getting package renaming in 1.0.

It would also be nice if we could get some more examples in 1.0!

-Dan

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Thanks for starting this thread.  There are a few recent conversations on
> this topic [1][2].
>
> My thought is that we should bear down and focus on the issues that help
> geode become “graduation-ready”.  Here’s a candidate list:
>
> v1.0.0-incubating:
> -----
> GEODE-37 (package renaming)
> GEODE-1791 (LICENSE update)
> + some bugs fixes as they come in
>
> v1.0.0+
> -----
> everything else
>
>
> Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
>
> Anthony
>
> [1] https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-
> dev/201609.mbox/%3cef2278f9-a216-4f64-8576-c9d091747...@pivotal.io%3e
> [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-
> dev/201609.mbox/%3cCAHEKSULW1J6RWEXqVF_v1Fw9AJimaeXY7gDy5FmjtfkWb2_
> g...@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
> > On Sep 8, 2016, at 4:24 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > I can take on this task for 1.0
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:20 PM, William Markito <wmark...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> >> With M3 out and all the discussions we're having around what's needed
> for
> >> 1.0, I think we should continue the rotation of release managers and
> get a
> >> new volunteer for 1.0.
> >>
> >> As part of this conversation we should also discuss the scope and
> roadmap
> >> for 1.0 and could use the thread [1] for M3 as a starting point.
> >>
> >> Here is what got discussed:
> >>
> >> -------------
> >> Guys, restarting this thread to get a discussion going about M3, 1.0.0
> and
> >> next -  As the release manager for M3 here is what I'd like to propose.
> >>
> >> Any feedback is welcome and let's also reuse this thread to talk a
> little
> >> bit about roadmap as well ?
> >>
> >> # Current M3 Scope (https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/GEODE/1.0.
> >> 0-incubating.M3+Release)
> >>
> >> GEODE-33
> >> GEODE-823
> >> GEODE-835
> >> GEODE-919
> >> GEODE-1146
> >> GEODE-1168
> >> GEODE-1203
> >> GEODE-1259
> >> GEODE-1278
> >> GEODE-1293
> >> GEODE-1316
> >> GEODE-1256
> >> GEODE-1267
> >>
> >> == Proposed scope & roadmap ==
> >>
> >> I'd like to breakdown the release a little bit and already start
> planning
> >> the next releases.
> >>
> >> # Geode 1.0.0-incubating M3
> >>
> >> GEODE-1316 Update @since tags to include GemFire or Geode in the version
> >> name
> >> GEODE-1293 Align code and docs for modules
> >> GEODE-1278 AbstractPeerTXRegionStub should throw
> >> TransactionDataNodeHasDeparted when remote cache is closed
> >> GEODE-1267 NOTICE file improvements
> >> GEODE-1256 Geode website - Unapproved licenses
> >> GEODE-1203 gfsh connect --use-http reports a ClassNotFoundException
> >> GEODE-919 GEODE-823 Remove checksums from .asc files (asc.md5, asc.sha1)
> >> GEODE-835 Replace joptsimple source with a binary dependency
> >> GEODE-823 RC Feedback: Fix build artifacts
> >> GEODE-33-1 Create project examples
> >>
> >> # Geode 1.0.0-incubating
> >>
> >> GEODE-33-2 Create project examples
> >> GEODE-1331 gfsh.bat on Windows is incorrect
> >> GEODE-1168 geode-dependencies manifest is missing jars that are present
> in
> >> the lib directory
> >> GEODE-629 Replace use of org.json with Jackson JSON library
> >> GEODE-607 the offheap package needs better unit test coverage
> >> GEODE-136 Fix possible NullPointerException in Gfsh's 'list regions'
> >> command's GetRegionsFunction.
> >>
> >> # Geode 1.X.0-incubating
> >>
> >> GEODE-17 Provide Integrated Security
> >> GEODE-11 Lucene Integration
> >> GEODE-33-3 Create project examples
> >>
> >> # Geode 2.0.0-incubating
> >>
> >> GEODE-72 Remove deprecated APIs from Geode
> >> GEODE-37 Package renaming
> >> -------------
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/6roww5yc3xhdpdck
> >> --
> >> ~/William
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to