> On Sept. 14, 2016, 11:20 p.m., Darrel Schneider wrote:
> >

Spoke to Darrel, he is fine with the changes as is...


- anilkumar


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51875/#review148993
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 14, 2016, 12:22 a.m., anilkumar gingade wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51875/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 14, 2016, 12:22 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Darrel Schneider, Eric Shu, Ken Howe, and Swapnil 
> Bawaskar.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> GEODE-1885: Missing subsctiption event with Offheap partitioned region during 
> bucket rebalance.
> 
> During the trasaction commit on redundant bucket region, if the bucket region 
> is moved, the call-back logic (to deliver subscription events) were not 
> invoked due to check-readiness call with offheap region. The check-readiness 
> throws exception, if the region is not found, which causes the code to return 
> early without sending the subscription events.
> 
> In this scenario, calling check-readiness was not needed...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/AbstractDiskRegionEntry.java
>  41cd110 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/AbstractRegionEntry.java
>  5778a82 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/AbstractRegionMap.java
>  81e4d9f 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/ClientServerTransactionDUnitTest.java
>  08953d5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51875/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Reproduced the missing create event with the submitted test. And verified 
> with the fix.
> pre-checkin.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> anilkumar gingade
> 
>

Reply via email to