Note: Doc situation is similar to that of JVSD, except there are more docs for Hibernate.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, William Markito <wmark...@pivotal.io> wrote: > If moving to a feature branch is a better approach, I'm fine as well.. > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > Correct. Put it on a feature branch awaiting contributions. > > > > > > > > On 23/09/2016 8:41 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > >> By remove, do you mean “put it on a feature branch awaiting > >> contributions?” > >> > >> hibernate-3.5.5 was released in 2010 and has undergone significant > >> changes since then. Seems reasonable to put this feature on hold until > can > >> be brought current. > >> > >> Anthony > >> > >> On Sep 22, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 to removing until updated to newer version > >>> > >>> Do we know if anyone in the big-bad world is using it? > >>> > >>> --Udo > >>> > >>> > >>> On 23/09/2016 8:15 AM, William Markito wrote: > >>> > >>>> Folks, > >>>> > >>>> We're still building the Hibernate cache module [1] but it's > compatible > >>>> only with a very old version (3.5) and given that the API has > completely > >>>> changed and unless someone in the community wants to help getting this > >>>> module up-to-date with at least Hibernate 5.x I'd like propose to > remove > >>>> the module from 1.0 / develop until we can work on updating that > module. > >>>> > >>>> Given that it's already a separate module it shouldn't be that hard to > >>>> be > >>>> removed. > >>>> > >>>> Thoughts ? > >>>> > >>>> [1] > >>>> http://geode.docs.pivotal.io/docs/tools_modules/hibernate_ca > >>>> che/chapter_overview.html > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > -- > > ~/William >
