Hi Nabarun, I think we crossed wires. In 8929e93bd129b303aae8f9e1b13daf3c3991d1a4 I added @flaky to a few bugs you just marked as resolved:
GEODE-1148 GEODE-1364 GEODE-1384 GEODE-1448 Could you remove the @flaky annotation from these tests? Thanks, Anthony > On Oct 1, 2016, at 5:09 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > I reviewed a bunch of CI failures today. I closed out duplicates and added > the ‘CI’ label to JIRA tickets that were missing it. I just posted a big > review to add the FlakyTest category to bugs with non-reproducible > failures—pretty much any CI bug that is currently open. Your comments are > appreciated (I can push a feature branch if that’s easier): > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/52468/ > > I found several open issues where the flaky category had been removed. Can > these be marked resolved? > > GEODE-933 > GEODE-977 > GEODE-1011 > GEODE-1062 > GEODE-1066 > GEODE-1147 > > I have a suspicion that the following open issues are actually fixed. Any > ideas? > > GEODE-1918 > GEODE-1333,1334,1335 > > > Anthony >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
