+1 drop it as a bug with no need for replacement (or in favor of using a
function)

On Tuesday, October 11, 2016, William Markito <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 -  We always discouraged people using dynamic regions
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Dan Smith <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to reopen the discussion about deprecating
> > DynamicRegionFactory. This is some old crufty code I don't think we
> > want anyone to use. I see we had a ticket to deprecated it
> > (GEODE-388), but we chose not to do it because we don't have an
> > alternative API to create regions from the client (GEODE-215).
> >
> > The thing is, there is a pretty easy workaround to use functions to
> > create regions from the client. Personally I'd recommend that over
> > DynamicRegionFactory. Can we just deprecate DynamicRegionFactory now
> > and implement GEODE-215 later?
> >
> > -Dan
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> ~/William
>

Reply via email to