1) +1 - How long were you proposing Kirk? I’d suggest something like 120-130. 
Regardless of the length chosen we could end up with anomaly Darrel pointed out 
with a comment at the end of a long line. In these cases it’s probably better 
to put the comment on a separate line.
2) +1
3) +1
4) +1


> On Oct 27, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Darrel Schneider <dschnei...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
> something I noticed that may have been caused by the reformatting was an
> end of line comment that ended up with one word on every line. A longer max
> line probably would have prevented this but now that everything has been
> reformatted with a max of 100 I doubt that it would combine comments like
> this back to a single line.
> 
> line 1708 of GMSMembershipManager has an end of line comment
> that ends up with a single word on each line like so:
>      List<InternalDistributedMember> members =
> (List<InternalDistributedMember>) ex.getMembers(); // We
> 
>                       // need
> 
>                       // to
> 
>                       // return
> 
>                       // this
> 
>                       // list
> 
>                       // of
> 
>                       // failures
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> 
>> 1) 0
>> 2) +1
>> 3) +1
>> 4) 0
>> 
>> 
>> On 27/10/16 3:11 pm, Kirk Lund wrote:
>> 
>>> I'd like to propose making a few changes to our IntelliJ and Eclipse
>>> formatters as well as the Eclipse importorder (all in etc/):
>>> 
>>> 1) increase max line length (100 is way too short)
>>> 2) make (hopefully minor) changes to make the two formatters more
>>> consistent with each other
>>> 3) change Eclipse importorder to follow the google style as closely as
>>> possible
>>> 4) update the import ordering in IntelliJ formatter to match Eclipse
>>> 
>>> The goal is to make both formatters produce the exact same results
>>> including ordering of imports while maintaining them to be as close to the
>>> google style as possible. Right now if you run IntelliJ formatter, the
>>> result will fail the spotlessCheck. We may have to make some small
>>> compromises in our adherence to the google style but I think that's
>>> reasonable in order to get the formatters both working consistently.
>>> 
>>> The gradle spotless tasks currently use the Eclipse formatter. One further
>>> change would be to add the Eclipse importorder file for spotless to use.
>>> 
>>> -Kirk
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to