Good catch Gal. Regards, Dor
-----Original Message----- From: Anthony Baker [mailto:aba...@pivotal.io] Sent: יום ב 07 נובמבר 2016 01:20 To: geode <dev@geode.incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: classpath in geode release > On Nov 6, 2016, at 7:47 AM, Gal Palmery <gal.palm...@amdocs.com> wrote: > > Clarification - > This is in the geode-dependencies.jar and gfsh-dependencies.jar that were > created by the local build that I run on my PC. > I downloaded the 1.0.0-incubating release and built it using the following > command: >> gradlew clean build installDist -Dskip.tests=true > Yep, this looks like a bug, though probably harmless. The geode-core dependencies pull in v2.8.0 transitively: +--- com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:2.8.2 | +--- com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations:2.8.0 | \--- com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core:2.8.2 while the geode-pulse and geode-web-api modules pull in v2.8.2 with an explicit dependency. These should be filtered when we build the classpath. See GEODE-2078. > where can I find these jars (geode-dependencies.jar and > gfsh-dependencies.jar) that are created each nightly build? > I tried in the maven central repository, but they are not there. There jars aren’t published to maven as they are manifest-only jars meant for cmd line usage. The build artifacts can be found in jenkins (see https://builds.apache.org/job/Geode-nightly) but those should only be used for development purposes and are not official releases. > > Thanks, > Gal > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gal Palmery > Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2016 11:43 > To: dev@geode.incubator.apache.org > Subject: classpath in geode release > > Hi, > > I noticed that there are 2 jackson-annotations jars, and 2 slf4j-api jars > with different versions in the classpath (in the MANIFESTs of > geode-dependencies.jar and in gfsh-dependencies.jar). > What is the reason for that? Is this a bug? > > Thanks, > Gal > > This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and > confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at > http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp