On Monday, June 14, 2010, François Van Der Biest <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for this patch, Eric.
Or maybe we shouldn't have LayerRecord map the "title" field to "name". The definition of the "title" field and the mapping to "map" should be done in LayerReader, if no recordType is provided. The common case is indeed to map "title" to "name" it looks like, instead it is specific to the LayerReader. What do you guys think? I can cook up a quick patch if people agree with the idea. This patch could break existing apps (those creating specific record types using LayerRecord.create and assuming these types include a "title" field that maps to "name), but I guess this is ok since we're pre 1.0. -- Eric Lemoine Camptocamp France SAS Savoie Technolac, BP 352 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96 Mail : [email protected] http://www.camptocamp.com _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
