On 12/16/10 2:56 AM, Ivan Grcic wrote: > Hi all, > > im forwarding this email from openlayers dev list because i think it > concearn us, GeoExt devs also >
I think the best solution is to restrict access to a single directory. The alternative of not storing them some place central and accessible by more than one person would likely result in the OpenLayers situation - where OSGeo and the rest of the OL PSC doesn't have access to *any* of the CLA. > >>>> >>>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 6:11 AM, ext Roald de Wit wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Identity theft is a matter of concern these days. Wouldn't making >>>>> people's signatures publicly available add to this? >>>> >>>> This is the reason that CLAs are not in SVN: both signatures (where they >>>> are >>>> provided) and addresses seemed like information that we would be better off >>>> not publishing. >>>> >>>> I don't have a better suggestion right now, but that was the original >>>> reason. >>> > > Ive recently signed CLA for GeoExt, and I also didn't like that all my > data were publicly available in GeoExt SVN repository. > So I guess we have the same issue for GeoExt. Wouldn't it be smart to > temp. remove that directory until the solution is found? > Or put some censorship on the data? > > Regards, > Ivan > > >>> Can we control access? >>> >>> I'm sure I can dig around the OSGeo machine and find out for myself - so I >>> apologize for asking before trying. >> >> You probably don't actually have access to that machine :) SVN is hosted on >> the centralized >> SVN/trac server. >> >>> Limiting a portion of the repo to the PSC seems like a sensible measure. >> >> I don't know if that's possible. Asking on the SAC list if anyone else has >> done it >> would be appropriate. The only private SVN stuff I'm aware of for osgeo is a >> totally >> separate repo, which I wanted to avoid the maintenance hassle of. >> >> -- Chris >> >>> Tim >>> >>>> -- Chris >>>> >>>>> Regards, Roald >>>>> >>>>> On 07/12/10 04:51, Tim Schaub wrote: >>>>>> I think it would make sense to maintain digital copies of contributor >>>>>> agreements in our repository. The record keeping process is a bit >>>>>> opaque to me at this point, and I think it would benefit us in the >>>>>> future to have a more accessible place for these documents. I assume we >>>>>> forward signed copies to OSGeo, but maintaining them next to the code >>>>>> makes sense to me as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> Going forward, would others be in favor of maintaining digital copies of >>>>>> CLAs in subversion? >>>>>> >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> >>>>> > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev -- Tim Schaub OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
